Privacy-o-meter for Bitcoin Transactions

Privacy score result
for the transaction:
32
Low
Privacy
issues:
3

Matched addresses identified

Using several indicators we were able to link the similar types of addresses involved in this transaction. We identified which of the recipient addresses possibly belong to one or more senders. Such matching significantly reduces the anonymity of addresses.
Matched inputs & outputs
0.05901000  BTC 508.76 USD
0.00180000  BTC 15.52 USD
0.00113000  BTC 9.27 USD
0.00290000  BTC 25.00 USD
0.00660000  BTC 57.10 USD
0.00713763  BTC 59.04 USD
0.02077000  BTC 198.54 USD
0.00845000  BTC 84.80 USD
0.00866000  BTC 86.91 USD
0.00004900  BTC 0.42  USD
0.00476400  BTC 41.07  USD
0.01645200  BTC 141.84  USD
0.01970200  BTC 169.86  USD
0.00679000  BTC 58.54  USD
0.00626200  BTC 53.99  USD
0.00100200  BTC 8.64  USD
0.00271200  BTC 23.38  USD
0.05677200  BTC 489.46  USD
0.00167200  BTC 14.42  USD

Issues that are possible to fix

Co-spending
Unless it's a CoinJoin transaction it's safe to assume that all input addresses belong to one person
How to improve?
Try not to send a BTC amount higher than you hold on one of your addresses. If you value your privacy on Bitcoin more than the transaction costs, then opt to send more transactions. Your addresses will not be linked to each other.

Software-dependent issues that are not fixable

Ascending input timestamps
For transaction with more than 5 inputs — they are ordered by age — that may be due to some specific software usage
Discrepancy: various input types
The inputs are of different types. That means the sender is probably using the software allowing to create the same address type for the change as the recipient has, trying to circumvent the script_types heuristic
We use 100+ indicators to measure the privacy scores of Bitcoin transactions.

In some cases the score may be improved, while some indicators are dependent on the software used to interact with the Bitcoin blockchain. Such privacy issues are not possible to fix unless the user changes the app or website used.
Critical - The identified issues are significantly endangering the privacy of the parties involved. Usually, the critical score is shown when it is possible to group the addresses that belong to the same owner or when the transaction has a lot of privacy issues.

Low - The identified issues are severely jeopardizing the privacy of the parties involved. Usually the Low score is assigned to the transactions with a lot of privacy issues.

Moderate - The identified issues are not that severe but can still be used by tracking tools to trace your transactions.

High - The identified issues are negligible and do not pose a serious threat to the privacy of involved parties/addresses.

Healthy - The transaction has no privacy issues. Third parties can’t extract any privacy-related information about the transaction or addresses involved.

General guidelines for sending BTC transactions

Blockchair can not help you improve the privacy of your
transactions but here are some basic recommendations
on how to stay anonymous on the Bitcoin network
Don't send round numbers

Don't send round amounts. Instead of sending 0.1 BTC, send 0.10125

Use Bitcoin Mixers

Mixers add an additional layer of privacy to a transaction to avoid exposing user identities.

Avoid reusing wallets

Don't send your Bitcoin change to the same address you use for sending bitcoins.

Avoid including many of your addresses in one transaction

Any time you can, try not to send BTC from your various Bitcoin addresses.

Avoid using "send everything" option

If you are withdrawing funds from an exchange, it is okay.
If you're moving funds to another wallet, do not transfer the whole amount to another address. It greatly compromises your privacy.

The detailed list of indicators and recommendations are available in API docs

Check all indicators

Get privacy scores with Blockchair API for free

For all privacy-oriented wallets and services
who wish to feature and link to the Privacy-o-meter